Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:10:43 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Nakata Maho <chat95@mac.com> Cc: kris@obsecurity.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/biology/pymol Makefile distinfo pkg-plist ports/biology/pymol/files patch-Rules.make patch-setup+pymol+com+linux-rh7x Message-ID: <20040318231043.GA97848@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20040319.081248.846937474.chat95@mac.com> References: <200403171047.i2HAlUsL048731@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040317111525.GA62305@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040319.081248.846937474.chat95@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 08:12:48AM +0900, Nakata Maho wrote:
> In Message-ID: <20040317111525.GA62305@xor.obsecurity.org>
> Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 02:47:29AM -0800, Maho Nakata wrote:
> >
> > > | +.if !defined(PICFLAG)
> > > | +.if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "sparc64"
> > > | +PICFLAG=-fPIC
> > > | +.else
> > > | +PICFLAG=-fpic
> > > | +.endif
> > > | +.endif
> >
> > As far as I understand, there's no need to treat these differently:
> > -fPIC is appropriate on all architectures.
>
> Wow, thanks!
> Committed to math/atlas, math/atlas-devel, biology/pymol
Actually...obrien followed up to my mail and pointed out that -fpic is
a minor optimization over -fPIC when you can get away with it. That
depends on the architecture and the program, so it needs to be tested.
Kris
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFAWixzWry0BWjoQKURAmXiAKC14gqt5AgNwiH0Q3dmzIkU0S3KJwCdELNW
YK331+d/e6EGAgZx0KvY8pc=
=+yly
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040318231043.GA97848>