Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1998 02:23:14 -0700 (PDT) From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami) To: cracauer@cons.org Cc: cracauer@cons.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG, andreas@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: pending/7574 Message-ID: <199808120923.CAA08238@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: <19980812110911.A12338@cons.org> (message from Martin Cracauer on Wed, 12 Aug 1998 11:09:11 %2B0200)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Ah, yes. And I always wondered why people claim GNATS isn't perfect * for relativly loosy coupled people :-) :) By the way, what do you (guys) think about adding the following to send-pr? === Index: send-pr.sh =================================================================== RCS file: /usr/cvs/src/gnu/usr.bin/send-pr/send-pr.sh,v retrieving revision 1.6.2.1 diff -u -r1.6.2.1 send-pr.sh --- send-pr.sh 1998/02/16 18:24:53 1.6.2.1 +++ send-pr.sh 1998/08/12 02:12:44 @@ -297,6 +297,11 @@ SEND-PR: Please consult the send-pr man page `send-pr(1)' or the Texinfo SEND-PR: manual if you are not sure how to fill out a problem report. SEND-PR: +SEND-PR: Do not CC: this mail to any other party. If that person replies +SEND-PR: to your direct mail, GNATS will not be able to recognize it as +SEND-PR: a followup to your report and will open up another PR every time +SEND-PR: there is a communication between you and the other party. +SEND-PR: SEND-PR: Note that the Synopsis field is mandatory. The Subject (for SEND-PR: the mail) will be made the same as Synopsis unless explicitly SEND-PR: changed. === I'm wondering if we should even put it right in the mail header, like === To: $GNATS_ADDR SEND-PR: Do not CC: or BCC: this mail to others! Subject: From: $FROM Reply-To: $REPLY_TO X-send-pr-version: $VERSION === Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199808120923.CAA08238>