Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 13:40:31 +0100 From: Andrew Turner <andrew@fubar.geek.nz> To: Svatopluk Kraus <skra@FreeBSD.org> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r301266 - head/sys/arm/freescale/imx Message-ID: <20160603134031.7a038244@zapp> In-Reply-To: <201606031105.u53B5tVi073576@repo.freebsd.org> References: <201606031105.u53B5tVi073576@repo.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 11:05:55 +0000 (UTC) Svatopluk Kraus <skra@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > Author: skra > Date: Fri Jun 3 11:05:55 2016 > New Revision: 301266 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/301266 > > Log: > Postpone allocation of IRQ resource to the time when interrupt > controller devices are attached. This has already been done for > bus_setup_intr(). > > There was no doubt that if someone wants to setup an interrupt, > corresponding interrupt controller device must already be attached. > However, the same must be valid for allocation of an interrupt > resource unless the allocation is done blindly, without any > information that such interrupt even exists. While it was done this > blind way before, it won't be possible after next INTRNG change. > > Modified: > head/sys/arm/freescale/imx/imx6_anatop.c > > Modified: head/sys/arm/freescale/imx/imx6_anatop.c > ============================================================================== > --- head/sys/arm/freescale/imx/imx6_anatop.c Fri Jun 3 > 10:28:06 2016 (r301265) +++ > head/sys/arm/freescale/imx/imx6_anatop.c Fri Jun 3 11:05:55 > 2016 (r301266) @@ -78,7 +78,6 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$"); > static struct resource_spec imx6_anatop_spec[] = { > { SYS_RES_MEMORY, 0, RF_ACTIVE }, > - { SYS_RES_IRQ, 0, RF_ACTIVE }, Why not mark it as optional? Andrew
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160603134031.7a038244>