Date: 27 Sep 1998 08:53:16 +0200 From: Peter Mutsaers <plm@xs4all.nl> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Softupdates panics Message-ID: <87yar66o83.fsf@muon.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: Ollivier Robert's message of "Sat, 26 Sep 1998 13:00:55 %2B0200" References: <87k92qksnj.fsf@totally-fudged-out-message-id>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> "OR" == Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr> writes:
OR> According to Kevin Street:
>> added `noatime' to two of my heavily used softupdates slices in
OR> noatime with SU is a known Bad Thing[tm]. We should probably
OR> refuse to use bth at the same time. noatime seems to be
OR> unnecessary with SU anyway.
Why a bad thing? I can see its use (especially when only reading a
lot). Btw I've been using it for a while, without crashes until now.
Is it really something one should not do?
--
/\_/\
( o.o ) Peter Mutsaers | Abcoude (Utrecht), | Trust me, I know
) ^ ( plm@xs4all.nl | the Netherlands | what I'm doing.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87yar66o83.fsf>