Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 22:32:12 +0200 From: Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org> To: Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Another CSS suggestion: pre-wrap Message-ID: <51F57FCC.8090404@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20130728202301.GN2272@glenbarber.us> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1307281057160.9642@wonkity.com> <51F558D2.1010808@FreeBSD.org> <51F56688.5040900@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1307281308390.10705@wonkity.com> <51F57011.2000603@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1307281328360.10705@wonkity.com> <51F57C6E.9050608@FreeBSD.org> <20130728202301.GN2272@glenbarber.us>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2013.07.28. 22:23, Glen Barber wrote: > On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 10:17:50PM +0200, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: >> >I believe it is possible to make them work together. But using these >> >extensions requires using Saxon as the XSLT processor, which is >> >Java-based and slower than xsltproc. Even if we end up using Java >> >for PDF rendering, it would be better to keep the XHTML build fast >> >and Java-free so that committers can easily test their work. >> > > Yes, please, let's keep it Java-free... > > IMHO, it is bad enough some of use require use of Java for basic web > browsing. Adding that to a our doc build is a big red bug. What do you mean for basic web browsing? Where is Java required for that? Gabor
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51F57FCC.8090404>