Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 15 Sep 2015 12:52:22 -0500
From:      "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net>
To:        Kurt Lidl <lidl@pix.net>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Missing "Local system status"
Message-ID:  <20150915175222.GG1709@over-yonder.net>
In-Reply-To: <55F811F1.7040202@pix.net>
References:  <20150915080318.GA89697@server.rulingia.com> <55F811F1.7040202@pix.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 08:41:21AM -0400 I heard the voice of
Kurt Lidl, and lo! it spake thus:
> 
> So the real argument ought to be if rwhod/ruptime ought to be part of a
> different MK_xxx,

I think Peter's point is that 430.status-rwho shows uptime(1) info
too, if rwhod isn't writing out data for it to ruptime(1), so it's
still useful even without r*.  Which also means it's slightly
misnamed, but...


-- 
Matthew Fuller     (MF4839)   |  fullermd@over-yonder.net
Systems/Network Administrator |  http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/
           On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150915175222.GG1709>