Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 18 Sep 2012 02:11:38 +0200
From:      "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com>
To:        Zhihao Yuan <lichray@gmail.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, Lorenzo Cogotti <miciamail@hotmail.it>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Providing a default graphical environment on FreeBSD 
Message-ID:  <201209180011.q8I0Bcaa060336@fire.js.berklix.net>
In-Reply-To: Your message "Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:40:33 CDT." <CAGsORuD--BKCVB5wHEw5Q5SedhJ0reFVJtC3628tJAncbmgr8Q@mail.gmail.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> And then, a modern GUI should take care of Wifi, automount,

No thanks, seperate issues.


> and many
> things can't be done with a single WM. That's why I said "twm is not a
> modern GUI". So far, any questions?

TWM is not a modern window manager, but is small & light, & comes
with X11.  I'm happy we each can choose window managers
to replace it, or not, according to local host &/or per user criteria.

Someone mentioned some boxes want no X11: To extend that list:
(servers, firewalls, real time small embedded, minimised for security,
machines on low speed serial connections, SLIP maybe etc), + maybe
some blind people, using eg 40 char single line output devices (I've
never seen one but heard of 'em), & half blind people, perhaps using
([VESA?] or twm with giant fonts (cos anything newer than twm maybe
(guessing) might not tempt them so much).

Cheers,
Julian
-- 
Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultant, Munich http://berklix.com
 Reply below not above, like a play script.  Indent old text with "> ".
 Send plain text. Not: HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201209180011.q8I0Bcaa060336>