Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2012 23:25:38 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: UFS and ACLs Message-ID: <k20isv$k9q$1@ger.gmane.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, Can someone give an estimated / expected answer on these questions: * What is the performance impact (if any) for file systems mounted with either of the ACL options: acls, nfsv4acls, in the situation where most of the files do not have (and do not need) any ACLs? * Will the kernel automagically add ACLs (other than the regular Unix DAC bits) to new files on file systems mounted with acls/nfsv4acls? * The "regular" DAC bits have some nice propagation rules, e.g. new files created by a user belonging to a group which owns the directory have the GID of this group. Does this work with ACLs? * Which is the easier option to use/maintain, POSIX or NFSv4 ACLs?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?k20isv$k9q$1>