Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 02:17:23 +0800 From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@kuzbass.ru> To: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> Cc: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Mikolaj Golub <to.my.trociny@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Assertion lock == sq->sq_lock failed at /usr/src/sys/kern/subr_sleepqueue.c:327 Message-ID: <20090609181723.GA59598@svzserv.kemerovo.su> In-Reply-To: <4A2EA533.1040405@FreeBSD.org> References: <86d49eocwx.fsf@kopusha.onet> <20090608181728.GU1927@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <4A2EA533.1040405@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 11:08:51AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > Kostik Belousov wrote: > > This is fixed in HEAD by r185647. I did not merged it to 7, because I > > do not believe that somebody runs stable with INVARIANTS on :). > > I would imagine that people doing kernel module development for use in > -stable systems do that with regularity. I generally run STABLE with INVARIANTS and lots of other debug options while trying to debug a panic or hang in STABLE. And I expect it won't add another panic. Eugene Grosbein
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090609181723.GA59598>