Date: Sun, 16 Jun 1996 09:19:31 -0600 From: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net> To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org (FreeBSD-current users) Subject: Re: ktrace [Was: 2.2-960612-SNAP resolver problems] Message-ID: <199606161519.JAA26223@rocky.sri.MT.net> In-Reply-To: <199606160858.KAA00689@uriah.heep.sax.de> References: <199606160656.QAA19860@felix.antiquity.arts.su.edu.au> <199606160858.KAA00689@uriah.heep.sax.de>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
> > options KTRACE # Kernel Tracing; adds ~4k to kernel > > Well, right now i've counted about four ``aye''s, and one ``nope'' > from Nate. I'm not going to do the deed unless Nate seems to be > convinced about its usefulness, too, (so the only know objection is > withdrawn) or unless there's an overwhelming ``Go for it''. For 4K I say go for it. I thought it was more, and although I do understand the hit for syscalls, it can't be any worse than some of the other additions we make in GENERIC. So, my objection is withdrawn. Natehome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199606161519.JAA26223>