Date: Sun, 16 Jun 1996 09:19:31 -0600 From: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net> To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org (FreeBSD-current users) Subject: Re: ktrace [Was: 2.2-960612-SNAP resolver problems] Message-ID: <199606161519.JAA26223@rocky.sri.MT.net> In-Reply-To: <199606160858.KAA00689@uriah.heep.sax.de> References: <199606160656.QAA19860@felix.antiquity.arts.su.edu.au> <199606160858.KAA00689@uriah.heep.sax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > options KTRACE # Kernel Tracing; adds ~4k to kernel > > Well, right now i've counted about four ``aye''s, and one ``nope'' > from Nate. I'm not going to do the deed unless Nate seems to be > convinced about its usefulness, too, (so the only know objection is > withdrawn) or unless there's an overwhelming ``Go for it''. For 4K I say go for it. I thought it was more, and although I do understand the hit for syscalls, it can't be any worse than some of the other additions we make in GENERIC. So, my objection is withdrawn. Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199606161519.JAA26223>