Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 21:17:11 +0300 From: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: "Simon J. Gerraty" <sjg@juniper.net> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> Subject: Re: [CFT/RFC]: refactor bsd.prog.mk to understand multiple programs instead of a singular program Message-ID: <20121026181711.GU35915@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <20121026181253.C6EA958094@chaos.jnpr.net> References: <3F52B7C9-A7B7-4E0E-87D0-1E67FE5D0BA7@xcllnt.net> <CAGH67wRw_n2_KwVz=DZkMpeJ4t8mMf965nxehHsDV-mzTnn5cA@mail.gmail.com> <CADLo839EUTF9bP8VD3L1_boY8i-w8B87yHGRR7Zx6wONFnSnEQ@mail.gmail.com> <20121025225353.86DA658094@chaos.jnpr.net> <20121026050130.GL35915@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20121026062356.3143A58094@chaos.jnpr.net> <37989A40-4DBD-48C8-BD65-16C7C41454B6@bsdimp.com> <20121026172106.BA86458094@chaos.jnpr.net> <21B6834A-C986-4103-B395-D1F23FB23380@bsdimp.com> <20121026181253.C6EA958094@chaos.jnpr.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--vNKtQyIwo9cfIjjL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 11:12:53AM -0700, Simon J. Gerraty wrote: >=20 > On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 11:41:46 -0600, Warner Losh writes: > >It's called a transition period for a reason. The historical use has =3D > >permeated itself into many places, not all of which are obvious. >=20 > It would seem that leaving FreeBSD make as make, for the transition > period and installing bmake as bmake, would cause the least disruption > to everyone. This was the original proposal presented at BSDCan in 2011. >=20 > FreeBSD make already grok's the :tl and :tu modifiers, > so it is quite simple for the two to coexist for some period. >=20 > The only reason we are talking about having to frob ports etc now,=20 > is a new requirement introduced this year (by yourself I think) > that bmake replace make in base rather than allow coexistence. >=20 > If we are all happy to go back to the original plan, we can ease the > concerns of the folk you speak of? >=20 > The only downside is we wait a few more years for major build improvments. Can system build, initiated by make, call bmake immediately ? I suppose it could be fine even to error out if make is typed instead of bmake for src/. --vNKtQyIwo9cfIjjL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlCK06YACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4jeBQCg0u3d/BnFMYOp0h58QW4Mc+3h vbgAnA4HUmrbLKg7mOVSwthXSIHtq2oe =2edq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vNKtQyIwo9cfIjjL--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121026181711.GU35915>