Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 10 Apr 2003 07:31:25 -0500
From:      Eric Anderson <anderson@centtech.com>
To:        David Gilbert <dgilbert@velocet.ca>
Cc:        "Jin Guojun \[DSD\]" <j_guojun@lbl.gov>
Subject:   Re: tcp_output starving -- is due to mbuf get delay?
Message-ID:  <3E95641D.1080100@centtech.com>
References:  <3E94A22D.174321F0@lbl.gov>	<3E94A8C4.3A196E42@lbl.gov> <16020.61355.551242.159558@canoe.velocet.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David Gilbert wrote:
>>>>>>"Jin" == Jin Guojun <[DSD]" <j_guojun@lbl.gov>> writes:
>>>>>
> 
> Jin> Some details was left behind -- The machine is 2 GHz Intel P4
> Jin> with 1 GB memory, so the delay is not from either CPU or lack of
> Jin> memory.
> 
> I just want to quickly jump in with the comment that our GigE tests of
> routing through FreeBSD have exposed several-order-of-magnitude
> differences by changing ram/motherboard/which-slot-the-card-is-in.
> 
> Do not assume that a fast CPU is the key.  We went through 10
> motherboards to commission the current routers ... and sometimes
> faster cpus would route slower (in various combinations of
> motherboards and RAM).

Wow - this is very interesting.  I have two machines with GigE in them, 
one has 6 gige nics (intel pro/1000T server), in a dual Xeon 1.5Ghz 
(P4), with 2gb of ram.  I haven't put it into production yet, so if 
there are any tests I can do, let me know.  It would be good to know the 
pitfalls before I bring it up live.. :)

Eric


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric Anderson	   Systems Administrator      Centaur Technology
Attitudes are contagious, is yours worth catching?
------------------------------------------------------------------



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3E95641D.1080100>