Date: 28 Feb 2002 21:21:24 +1130 From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: Johann Frisch <jerfa@yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Pentium and NO_F00F_HACK = kernel panic Message-ID: <1014889885.13562.16.camel@chowder.gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20020228092726.2B33037B402@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20020227213355.EAAC837B405@hub.freebsd.org> <200202280123.RAA79623@star-one.liberator.dyndns.org> <20020228092726.2B33037B402@hub.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 2002-02-28 at 20:57, Johann Frisch wrote: > > "F00F hack" works around the CPU bug; the NO_F00F_HACK option > > disables the workaround.) > > I knew that and I have no problem using this option. I am just curious > if this kernel behaviour is intented or not? No, it shouldn't panic. You should have it on as it wouldn't save you very much space.. Could you get a stack trace (enable crash dumps etc..) and file a PR about it? :) --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1014889885.13562.16.camel>