Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 18:38:01 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is bad for me...) Message-ID: <200102130138.f1D1c1W33930@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:32:39 PST." <20010212173239.O3274@fw.wintelcom.net> References: <20010212173239.O3274@fw.wintelcom.net> <xzp8znbo04k.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <200102130127.f1D1RKU56334@mobile.wemm.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20010212173239.O3274@fw.wintelcom.net> Alfred Perlstein writes: : Er, why isn't /tmp/install.XXX done with static binaries? Because the binaries are host binaries and we have no control over whether they are static or dynmaic. At best we could do is to copy libraries over as well. But I think the major bumps ala Dag's 501 would be better. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200102130138.f1D1c1W33930>