Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2024 21:01:01 +0100 From: Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> To: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@freebsd.org> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-ports-all@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-ports-main@FreeBSD.org, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: git: df375e19a718 - main - emulators/yuzu: change LICENSE prohibiting redistribution Message-ID: <o7br-jfk2-wny@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <94860f60-6c5e-8dbb-86b2-b865cd87d5b5@freebsd.org> (Eugene Grosbein's message of "Wed, 6 Mar 2024 21:24:33 %2B0700") References: <202403061249.426CnR42052709@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <34t3-tte3-wny@FreeBSD.org> <305bc158-7a1b-fdd1-c76c-1406190034a2@freebsd.org> <a5nb-qy20-wny@FreeBSD.org> <94860f60-6c5e-8dbb-86b2-b865cd87d5b5@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Eugene Grosbein <eugen@freebsd.org> writes: > 06.03.2024 20:39, Jan Beich wrote: > Still, I think we need a way to prevent redistribution of packages at least > without messing with license terms. I'm not convinced this is necessary to do preemptively. For example, - emulators/dolphin-emu doesn't ship keys thus built on the package cluster - multimedia/libdvdcss generates keys thus restricted via LICENSE=DMCA Many distros (with binary packages) still ship yuzu. Those that did remove it appear to be in the same self-sabotaging camp (i.e., backed by a for-profit). For example, openSUSE Tumbleweed removed yuzu but kept hactool which is more focused on decryption - facepalm. See also https://repology.org/project/yuzu/history
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?o7br-jfk2-wny>