Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 30 Jan 2006 10:24:58 -0700 (MST)
From:      Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        peterjeremy@optushome.com.au
Cc:        rodrigc@freebsd.org, wb@freebie.xs4all.nl, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-src@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/mount Makefile extern.h mount_ufs.c
Message-ID:  <20060130.102458.41650754.imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060129000818.GF2341@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org>
References:  <20060128223343.GE2341@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20060128225700.GA88332@freebie.xs4all.nl> <20060129000818.GF2341@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/mount Makefile extern.h mount_ufs.c
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 11:08:18 +1100

> On Sat, 2006-Jan-28 23:57:00 +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> >On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 09:33:43AM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote..
> >> On Fri, 2006-Jan-27 21:57:25 -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> >> >On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 06:40:17PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> >> >> On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 11:22:56PM +0000, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> >> >> > rodrigc     2005-11-23 23:22:56 UTC
> >> >> > 
> >> >> >   FreeBSD src repository
> >> >> > 
> >> >> >   Modified files:
> >> >> >     sbin/mount           Makefile extern.h 
> >> >> >   Removed files:
> >> >> >     sbin/mount           mount_ufs.c 
> >> >> >   Log:
> >> >> >   Remove UFS-specific parts from mount(8).
> >> >> >   For mounting UFS, all mount options are passed directly to nmount(),
> >> >> >   without any UFS-specific logic.
> >> >> 
> >> >> Where do we stand on making 'mount /' from single user work again?
> >> >
> >> >Can you give us an update on where you stand on making 'mount /' work
> >> >again from single user?  We've been suffering from this for 2 months now.
> >> 
> >> "mount -r" also no longer works if the FS is marked "rw" in /etc/fstab.
> >> Instead you have to use "mount -o norw".  How about having "ro" imply
> >> "norw" and vice versa.
> >
> >Blurk..  norw == ro and noro == rw?  What is wrong with just sticking with
> >plain and simple rw and ro ?
> 
> ro and rw still exist but, based on my reading of the code, the options
> you enter are appended to the options in fstab so that if you say
> "mount -r" (or "mount -o ro"), nmount(2) is passed "rw,ro" and the "rw"
> over-rides the "ro".  "norw" makes mount(8) strip the "rw" and then
> nmount(2) defaults to ro.
> 
> I think mount(8) needs to grow some special-casing so that it knows that
> "ro" and "rw" are complementary.

Agreed.  mount -ur / and mount -uw / need to work no matter what is in
/etc/fstab.  They are heavily used in many scripts, for example, in
embedded and semi-embedded products.

Warner




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060130.102458.41650754.imp>