Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 23:46:34 +0200 From: Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> To: Yuri Pankov <yuripv@yuripv.dev> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DRM Project report (week of July 6th) Message-ID: <20200710234634.a49d8e98a53c4a2feb593fb1@bidouilliste.com> In-Reply-To: <67f9a36c-2eec-4128-79c8-9bf4c98c3617@yuripv.dev> References: <20200710232845.5461736e8d2cb198763d7442@bidouilliste.com> <67f9a36c-2eec-4128-79c8-9bf4c98c3617@yuripv.dev>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 11 Jul 2020 00:41:53 +0300 Yuri Pankov <yuripv@yuripv.dev> wrote: > Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > [...] > > Hi Emmanuel, > > Sorry for somewhat hijacking the thread, but as you mentioned (IIRC) > testing the vmwgfx in one of the previous mails, I'd like to ask if any > work/fixes is done for that. Currently I don't have a VM with X11 > installed as all my attempts didn't succeed -- it's either a hard hang, > panic, or VM dying with exception, even with a workaround of 1 CPU > (core) provided in the Wiki. I can reinstall and provide panic info if > you are interested in looking into it. Hi, I haven't tested vmwgfx or vboxvideo yet, iirc someone told me that at least vboxvideo used to work, I have no idea if vmwgfx used to. If you have any panic please open an issue there : https://github.com/freebsd/drm-kmod/ To be honest with you intel and amd are my priorities and already occupy most of my time for testing. The plan that I have is to be sure to have for vboxvideo and vmwgfx when I reach 5.4 -- Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20200710234634.a49d8e98a53c4a2feb593fb1>