Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 23:43:02 +0300 (MSK) From: "Vladimir B. Grebeschikov" <vova@express.ru> To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: DUAL-brand ELF binaries Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0001122341110.23562-100000@lanturn.kmost.express.ru> In-Reply-To: <200001122003.VAA47744@dorifer.heim3.tu-clausthal.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000, Oliver Fromme wrote: > Vladimir B. Grebeschikov <vova@express.ru> wrote in list.freebsd-emulation: > > Ok, I am understand it, but may be is the way to "mark" syscalls > > on point of syscall ? (while building libraries with syscalls) > > and use one, extended table of syscalls ? > > If you have the source code of the libraries (which is > necessary to "build" them), then why don't you simply > compile them for the same platform the binary is for? real situation: I have source code of linux libc (with syscalls) and source of my application that uses oracle client libraries, but I have no source of oracle libraries, in which no direct syscalls used, I hope > Regards > Oliver -- TSB Russian Express, Moscow Vladimir B. Grebenschikov, vova@express.ru To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0001122341110.23562-100000>