Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 14:31:23 +0200 From: Mark Santcroos <marks@ripe.net> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Junior Kernel Hacker task: improve vnode->v_tag Message-ID: <20010904143123.A534@laptop.6bone.nl> In-Reply-To: <12839.999606420@critter>; from phk@critter.freebsd.dk on Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 02:27:00PM %2B0200 References: <20010904081337.A8968@rcfile.org> <12839.999606420@critter>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 02:27:00PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >I've done a /cursory/ look over how this v_tag is used. I'm not sure > >this is a simple/clean as you propose, since this is used in the > >IS_LOCKING_VFS macro, as well as in union_subr.c... > > Well, that is just too bad, because IS_LOCKING_VFS is wrong then. That's what the line of comment above it said ;) /* * [dfr] Kludge until I get around to fixing all the vfs locking. */ Mark -- Mark Santcroos RIPE Network Coordination Centre http://www.ripe.net/home/mark/ New Projects Group/TTM To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010904143123.A534>