Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 09:35:47 -0700 From: Kenneth Ingham <ingham@i-pi.com> To: "Christopher G. Petrilli" <petrilli@amber.org>, Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net> Cc: security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Enabling bpf device in kernel (was: Re: tcpdump) Message-ID: <19990204093547.A3001@socrates.i-pi.com> In-Reply-To: <19990204102322.28863@amber.org>; from Christopher G. Petrilli on Thu, Feb 04, 1999 at 10:23:22AM -0500 References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990204095555.10265F-100000@www.babel.dk> <Pine.BSF.4.05.9902040505560.66070-100000@nomad.dataplex.net> <19990204102322.28863@amber.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Ick, I've never had anything but sickness with DHCP on Unices... I've run several with DHCP (including FreeBSD, Linux, and IRIX) and they all run fine. The idea of a question at install time to decide whether to use DHCP or a statis IP addr sounds good to me, as does making ISC DCHP part of the normal distribution (it's what I always use as a UNIX client). Kenneth To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990204093547.A3001>