Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 02:36:51 +0000 From: Kwangyul SEO <skyul@postech.ac.kr> To: Chris Byrnes <chris@JEAH.net> Cc: freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: tcsh.static vs. tcsh Message-ID: <20010204023651.A97012@shell.postech.ac.kr> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.32.0102031111190.82790-100000@awww.jeah.net>; from chris@JEAH.net on Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 11:11:41AM -0600 References: <Pine.BSF.4.32.0102031111190.82790-100000@awww.jeah.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, Binary compiled in static doesn't require any library, so when you have any problem in your libraries, you still can use your static tcsh and work. On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 11:11:41AM -0600, Chris Byrnes wrote: > /sbin/tcsh.static is the root shell on my machine.. Whats the difference > between that and regular tcsh? > > > Chris Byrnes > JEAH Communications > (Direct) 608-256-6167 > (Toll-Free) 866-299-5324 > http://www.JEAH.net > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > -- Thanks icq UIN 104946812, Kwangyul Seo <skyul@postech.edu> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010204023651.A97012>