Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 05:29:45 -0700 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> Cc: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.org> Subject: Re: A proposed drastic cleanup of the telnet build. Message-ID: <3EDF37B9.1F5EF3FD@mindspring.com> References: <20030605104620.GA47983@sunbay.com> <20030605120903.GB53363@sunbay.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > Are the telnet sources really considered crypto sources? > Yes, they use crypto functionality if compiled with the > corresponding options, but they just USE them, they > don't PROVIDE them. As such, should we treat them as > restricted? If yes, I'd like to (please) hear why are > they treated as such? If not, then the solution is > obvious, keep them under src/*/(lib)telnet(d). I think the answer is "the better to deprecate telnet, by making it harder to get working". 8-|. -- Terry
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3EDF37B9.1F5EF3FD>