Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 17:32:58 +0400 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: suspend bug Message-ID: <20020721133257.GA8289@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <20020721202537.U19918-100000@gamplex.bde.org> References: <20020721083307.GA6009@nagual.pp.ru> <20020721202537.U19918-100000@gamplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jul 21, 2002 at 20:30:14 +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > > Er, there is no kernel bug here AFAIK. Where is the bug, then? > I don't really understand rev.1.54 > of su.c. Is it related to the PAM brokenness that is worked around in > rev.1.53? Rev 1.54 is not related to PAM (something about ^C), it fix suspend + fg. I.e. for tcsh: a) with 1.54 "suspend + fg" works, "stop $$ + fg" not works. b) without 1.54 vice versa, "suspend + fg" not works, "stop $$ + fg" works Where is the real bug? -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020721133257.GA8289>