Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 11:35:13 +0100 From: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> To: Dave Hayes <dave@jetcafe.org> Cc: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>, FreeBSD <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ? Message-ID: <CADLo83-9jE1zAtdXrA78=K5AE7yR4UsMh=efeC5L4kXijaDFaQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201206040841.q548fVHa091169@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> References: <CAOgwaMvsv3e1TxDauV038Pp7LRiYeH7oAODE%2Bw-pxHt9oGrXMA@mail.gmail.com> <201206020012.q520CEcf057568@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <20120602004230.GA14487@in-addr.com> <201206040224.q542OBqk085897@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <20120604043233.GB32597@lonesome.com> <201206040841.q548fVHa091169@hugeraid.jetcafe.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jun 4, 2012 9:50 AM, "Dave Hayes" <dave@jetcafe.org> wrote: > > Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> writes: > > On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 07:24:11PM -0700, Dave Hayes wrote: > >> I see features and pkgng and things being offered up as solutions... > >> these are all well and good, but in my opinion more comprehensive > >> documentation and support in these areas would do more good than pkgng. > > IMHO pkgng and optionsng are necessary, but not sufficient, to solve > > our current problems. > > Optionsng is nice, but lacking in documentation. Is it too much to ask > port maintainers to write a bit more documentation on the options they > are providing? Where are you looking? I updated the Porter's Handbook- is there something missing? Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo83-9jE1zAtdXrA78=K5AE7yR4UsMh=efeC5L4kXijaDFaQ>