Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 22:23:41 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: Lars Eighner <stableuser@larseighner.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bring sio up to 8+ Message-ID: <5E1F466E-FA00-4EB5-BC26-5389BB6C5416@xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1105220651110.7265@abbf.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1105220651110.7265@abbf.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On May 22, 2011, at 4:58 AM, Lars Eighner wrote: > > It seems increasing unlikely that uart will ever support the only internal > hardware modem recently available in the US (PR kern/155196), so what are > the chances of sio (which works in 7.x reasonably well and better with a > one-line hack) being brought forward? The PR states that uart(4) basically works, but that "reconnecting on demand" doesn't. What makes you think this is a problem with uart(4) and not with the TTY overhaul? -- Marcel Moolenaar marcel@xcllnt.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5E1F466E-FA00-4EB5-BC26-5389BB6C5416>