Date: 21 Jan 2002 16:54:56 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> Cc: mark@grondar.za, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Step6, corresponding /etc/pam.d/* fixes for review Message-ID: <xzpbsfnwvfz.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <20020121154244.GC37234@nagual.pp.ru> References: <20020121142038.GA36519@nagual.pp.ru> <xzpsn8zwwey.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020121154244.GC37234@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> writes: > One reason still exist: all users (i.e. non-OPIE too) will see OTP > responses when pam_opie will be uncommented. It may leads to confusion or > wrong automated scripts processing. Ah, I thought pam_opie(8) ignored users that didn't have OPIE set up. Silly me for making assumptions :) > I have idea to solve it adding "no_fake_prompts" option to pam_opie to > control that per admin choice. Yep, excellent idea. I'll get right on it. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpbsfnwvfz.fsf>