Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2026 14:53:57 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger <pi@freebsd.org> To: "Patrick M. Hausen" <hausen@punkt.de> Cc: FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: State of Elasticsearch and related ports Message-ID: <aa7Q9TEwUPJXcGo1@fc.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <24BA4834-620A-42EA-B58E-18C86A7507E5@punkt.de> References: <A5C06584-C8B9-4978-B0FF-7FB9620D1A89@punkt.de> <aawUmaomyk9xPmMa@fc.opsec.eu> <24BA4834-620A-42EA-B58E-18C86A7507E5@punkt.de>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Hi! > > As I'm not a user, can someone explain to me if we really need 9.1 and 9.2 > > versions in parallel in the tree? > > I asked our local Elasticsearch guru and he cannot think of a reason to > use 9.1 instead of 9.2 assuming the latter is available. > > It would be great to have current Elasticsearch ports and packages again. saro@ said that there are now 9.3 Elasticsearch releases ? How often do you as a 'user org' need 9.2 and 9.3 to test migrations etc ? -- pi@FreeBSD.org +49 171 3101372 Now what ?home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?aa7Q9TEwUPJXcGo1>