Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 23:59:24 -0700 From: Avleen Vig <lists-freebsd@silverwraith.com> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released Message-ID: <20060512065924.GB525@silverwraith.com> In-Reply-To: <44640422.1000006@rogers.com> References: <44600A42.7030600@samsco.org> <44601F4A.9070802@elischer.org> <446021DE.6040507@rogers.com> <20060511210912.GA1344@zaphod.nitro.dk> <4463DC96.70908@rogers.com> <446402BB.7050201@alumni.rice.edu> <44640422.1000006@rogers.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 11:42:26PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote: > >The *entire* errata page was from 6.0; it was a mistake. This wasn't > >some "put on the rose-colored classes and gloss over major issues" > >thing. It was a long release cycle and something was forgotten. C'est > >la vie. It's always a good idea to check the most up-to-date version of > >the errata page on the web anyway, so it's *not* too late to update it. > > How convenient. These problems needed to be addressed in the release > notes, not some on line version. If they're THAT big of a deal, learn some C, and fix the problems yourself, instead of sending e-mails that sound rude and ungrateful. And if you can't do that, how about helping scott put together release notes which you seemed to think were so awful? All I hear from you is complaining and a serious lack of anything constructive.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060512065924.GB525>