Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 12:51:17 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Attila_Bog=E1r?= <attila.bogar@linguamatics.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Chris Nehren <apeiron+freebsd-stable@isuckatdomains.net> Subject: Re: Who is responsible for Heimdal/Kerberos in FreeBSD Message-ID: <501BBB35.4050703@linguamatics.com> In-Reply-To: <20120802150441.GE11061@isuckatdomains.isuckatdomains.net> References: <501A781D.2050506@linguamatics.com> <20120802150441.GE11061@isuckatdomains.isuckatdomains.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 02/08/12 16:04, Chris Nehren wrote: > Rather than sending repeated mails to the list (which you've already > seen get dropped on the floor), consider using the proper channels for > reporting bugs. Send a PR. See http://www.freebsd.org/send-pr.html for > more information. Unfortunately I have to disagree with you. I have come across 3 NFS related PR's so far, I manually patching my system with them against STABLE. Let's see them: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=147998 - patch provided by the reporter, no resolution after 2 years. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=162009 - patch provided by the reporter, no resolution after 9 month http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=164933 - I reported with a patch, no resolution after 6 month Certainly I can report another PR with the problems I spotted and wait 2 years before I get an answer, but I don't call that problem solving. Or can you please explain what do you mean by "proper channel"? I can understand, that's pretty annoying (from my point SAD) that someone is sending problems to the mailing list and gets no hints. However I think, it's more sad, that the freebsd developer community is just ignoring the patches they are sent and doesn't considers quality assurance. Thanks, Attila
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?501BBB35.4050703>