Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 12:51:17 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Attila_Bog=E1r?= <attila.bogar@linguamatics.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Chris Nehren <apeiron+freebsd-stable@isuckatdomains.net> Subject: Re: Who is responsible for Heimdal/Kerberos in FreeBSD Message-ID: <501BBB35.4050703@linguamatics.com> In-Reply-To: <20120802150441.GE11061@isuckatdomains.isuckatdomains.net> References: <501A781D.2050506@linguamatics.com> <20120802150441.GE11061@isuckatdomains.isuckatdomains.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 02/08/12 16:04, Chris Nehren wrote: > Rather than sending repeated mails to the list (which you've already > seen get dropped on the floor), consider using the proper channels for > reporting bugs. Send a PR. See http://www.freebsd.org/send-pr.html for > more information. Unfortunately I have to disagree with you. I have come across 3 NFS related PR's so far, I manually patching my system with them against STABLE. Let's see them: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=147998 - patch provided by the reporter, no resolution after 2 years. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=162009 - patch provided by the reporter, no resolution after 9 month http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=164933 - I reported with a patch, no resolution after 6 month Certainly I can report another PR with the problems I spotted and wait 2 years before I get an answer, but I don't call that problem solving. Or can you please explain what do you mean by "proper channel"? I can understand, that's pretty annoying (from my point SAD) that someone is sending problems to the mailing list and gets no hints. However I think, it's more sad, that the freebsd developer community is just ignoring the patches they are sent and doesn't considers quality assurance. Thanks, Attilahome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?501BBB35.4050703>