Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 15:37:20 +0100 From: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> To: delphij@delphij.net Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org, hrs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Code policy on doc/ tree? Message-ID: <20060205143719.GB857@zaphod.nitro.dk> In-Reply-To: <a78074950601280909o489a0f7bn35ca3368052b6111@mail.gmail.com> References: <a78074950601280909o489a0f7bn35ca3368052b6111@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--R3G7APHDIzY6R/pk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2006.01.29 01:09:28 +0800, Xin LI wrote: > In order to be able to generate usable PDF and RTF files for the > FreeBSD Simplified Chinese Project, we have added several building > hooks into our local tree, which is available at: >=20 > http://cvsweb.freebsd.org.cn/doc/zh_CN.GB2312/share/mk/Attic/?only_with_t= ag=3DCNPROJ >=20 > Is code allowed here? Should we make it as a port? Hey, I think it would be a good idea to have it in the main repository so the complete doc build (including the build that generates document for ftp.freebsd.org) can use it. If it should be a port or directly in doc/ really depend on if you think it would be useful for people in general use and not just doc/, and if the files are used directly by TeX or need to be compiled as a normal program. If general purpose or need to be compiled I think a port would be preferable, and then just make it a dependency of the docproj port. Anyway, that's my 0.01$CURRENCY. --=20 Simon L. Nielsen --R3G7APHDIzY6R/pk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFD5g2fh9pcDSc1mlERAkhlAJ4vgs9K4mbT3MwZ5/pPIhBaMheQXgCbByqm hA0z7uZU5+RSjQu1Bsdm1Ww= =Fwck -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --R3G7APHDIzY6R/pk--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060205143719.GB857>