Date: 21 Jan 2002 17:00:04 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> Cc: mark@grondar.za, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Step6, corresponding /etc/pam.d/* fixes for review Message-ID: <xzp7kqbwv7f.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <20020121155316.GD37234@nagual.pp.ru> References: <20020121142038.GA36519@nagual.pp.ru> <xzpsn8zwwey.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020121155316.GD37234@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> writes: > I already comment "always turning opie on" in previous message, besides > that I don't understand one thing in your patch: why you not enable > pam_opie for "su" and not add pam_opieaccess there? It is enough useful > for sysadmin logging in as user via unencrypted telnet and then do "su" > for root. Hmm? Simple oversight, sorry. I'll post a new patch when I've fixed the "no_fake_prompts" thingy. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp7kqbwv7f.fsf>