Date: 14 Sep 1999 16:33:46 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> To: Cliff Crawford <ze5yr@zone.unixshell.com> Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>, Phil Regnauld <regnauld@ftf.net>, gmarco@scotty.masternet.it, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Re: freebsdcon and Radisson Hotel Reservation. Message-ID: <xzp7lltzho5.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Cliff Crawford's message of "Tue, 14 Sep 1999 10:10:52 -0400 (EDT)" References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9909141010100.34803-100000@zone.unixshell.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Cliff Crawford <ze5yr@zone.unixshell.com> writes:
> On 14 Sep 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> | Cliff Crawford <ze5yr@zone.unixshell.com> writes:
> | > Here's a perfect example of why it's BAD to not have reply-to headers
> | > on a mailing list.
> | Look again. The FreeBSD mailing lists don't set Reply-To.
> Yeah, that's what I just said.
Foo! I didn't see the "not".
"Reply-To" in connection with mailing lists has been discussed to
death in various fora. It's a semi-religious issue, though it is my
impression that most people who have actual experience managing
mailing lists ("actual experience" as opposed to "strong opinions
based on what one thinks managing a large mailing list may be like")
are against it. That includes me.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp7lltzho5.fsf>