Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 19:51:10 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> To: pav@FreeBSD.org Cc: doc@FreeBSD.org, devon.odell@coyotepoint.com Subject: Re: Fix for ithread.9 Message-ID: <20060825195110.450a1a7b.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <1156532704.8612.2.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> References: <44EF355D.5050208@coyotepoint.com> <1156532704.8612.2.camel@ikaros.oook.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 21:05:04 +0200 Pav Lucistnik <pav@freebsd.org> wrote: > Devon H. O'Dell p=ED=B9e v p=E1 25. 08. 2006 v 13:37 -0400: >=20 > > I was discussing UMA with Robert Watson yesterday; specifically its=20 > > usage implications in an interrupt context. He suggested adding some=20 > > information to ithread(9) specifying semantics for memory allocation in= =20 > > an interrupt context. So I came up with this tiny patch, shot it jhb@'s= =20 > > way, he reviewed it and told me to shoot it this way. > >=20 > > So here it is, apparently ready to be committed. >=20 > Applied, thanks! After you fixed the hard sentence break issue, right Pav? ;) --=20 Tom Rhodes
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060825195110.450a1a7b.trhodes>