Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 16:02:15 +0000 From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> To: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Step6, corresponding /etc/pam.d/* fixes for review Message-ID: <200201211602.g0LG2Ft42553@grimreaper.grondar.org> In-Reply-To: <20020121154244.GC37234@nagual.pp.ru> ; from "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> "Mon, 21 Jan 2002 18:42:44 %2B0300." References: <20020121154244.GC37234@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 16:33:57 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > > > 1) there's no reason to have pam_opie commented out now, it won't do > > One reason still exist: all users (i.e. non-OPIE too) will see OTP > responses when pam_opie will be uncommented. It may leads to confusion or > wrong automated scripts processing. > > I have idea to solve it adding "no_fake_prompts" option to pam_opie to > control that per admin choice. Yes. That would be a good move. :-) M -- o Mark Murray \_ FreeBSD Services Limited O.\_ Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200201211602.g0LG2Ft42553>