Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2000 02:16:03 -0400 From: Bill Fumerola <billf@chimesnet.com> To: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> Cc: Matt Heckaman <matt@ARPA.MAIL.NET>, FreeBSD-ISP <freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: FTP Servers Message-ID: <20000729021603.J5021@jade.chc-chimes.com> In-Reply-To: <200007290453.WAA25511@nomad.yogotech.com>; from nate@yogotech.com on Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 10:53:29PM -0600 References: <200007290440.WAA25453@nomad.yogotech.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007290047340.34363-100000@epsilon.lucida.qc.ca> <200007290453.WAA25511@nomad.yogotech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 10:53:29PM -0600, Nate Williams wrote:
> > Well, that's unfair. That bug hit virtually every ftpd around. I would not
> > hold it against proftpd.
>
> It didn't hit FreeBSD's stock ftpd.
FreeBSD's stock ftpd doesn't do anything near as much as proftpd.
> > Think about it for a moment, in my eyes, this bug does not
> > detract at all from proftpd's solid performance. Nobody is perfect.
>
> The same thing could be said about wu-ftpd, which has logged more miles
> than *any* other freeware ftp server. That it's worked for years
> doesn't mean it is seucre.
That it's worked for years is a miracle of modern computing.
--
Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH / Chimes, Inc.
billf@chimesnet.com / billf@FreeBSD.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000729021603.J5021>