Date: Wed, 24 Jul 1996 18:01:11 -0400 (EDT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@ki.net> To: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: anoncvs Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.94.960724180019.28155N-100000@ki.net> In-Reply-To: <199607242154.PAA02423@rocky.mt.sri.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 24 Jul 1996, Nate Williams wrote: > [ Anon CVS ]> > > > I've had users ask me fo rthis for the postgres95 repository, > > and the argument they used was tha twith CVS, they don't have to deal > > with having *(their* changes overwritten, cvs will merge the new changes > > from the repository in with the changes they have made... > > > > Can sup do this? > > If they SUP the CVS tree and don't expect to use the CVS tree locally > except for testingt, yes. Almost all of the FreeeBSD developers do this > exact thing as your pstgres developers are asking. Ahhh, okay, now I understand wha tyuo mean...yes, to me thi sdoes act as an acceptable solution to anoncvs, thanks :) Marc G. Fournier scrappy@ki.net Systems Administrator @ ki.net scrappy@freebsd.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.94.960724180019.28155N-100000>