Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 4 Nov 2000 11:37:31 -0800
From:      "Jeremiah Gowdy" <jgowdy@home.com>
To:        "Heredity Choice" <stork@QNET.COM>, "Allen Landsidel" <all@biosys.net>, "Nick Slager" <nicks@albury.net.au>, "jadream" <jadream@chat.ru>
Cc:        <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: FBSD & Itanium?
Message-ID:  <003301c04696$acbefb90$aa240018@cx443070b>
References:  <000901c04631$5a8e4930$4fc7ddd1@STORK>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> FreeBSD Alpha does not have the maturity of FreeBSD Intel, but it is
making
> great progress because of a few enthusiasts who recognize its great
> potential.

That's excellent to hear.

> Meanwhile the Itanium, if it ever becomes reality, is an answer in search
of
> a question.

Which is why my vote goes to Hammer.  Taking FreeBSD to x86-64 should not be
anything near the work of taking it to any other 64bit Platform.

> Paul Smith




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?003301c04696$acbefb90$aa240018>