Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 11:55:15 +0200 From: Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: KOT MATPOCKuH <matpockuh@gmail.com>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: named crashes on assertion in rbtdb.c o? sparc64/SMP Message-ID: <20110706095514.GF14797@alchemy.franken.de> In-Reply-To: <4E13B26D.6060203@FreeBSD.org> References: <BANLkTi=NRoyo_J-y5cA4LVJOXWaQMHE0sw@mail.gmail.com> <20110628155802.GA26562@alchemy.franken.de> <4E13B26D.6060203@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 05:55:09PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > On 06/28/2011 08:58, Marius Strobl wrote: > >Uhm, we once fixed a problem in the MD atomic implementation which > >still seems to present in the ISC copy. Could you please test whether > >the following patch makes a difference? > >http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/sparc64_isc_atomic.h.diff > > I haven't seen any verification from the OP that this patch solved the > problem, It simply doesn't so apparently there's another bug in other parts of BIND causing it to trip over that assertion. Still, the clobber lists of the sparc64 atomic bits were incomplete and fixing that IMO was the right thing to do. > however it did pass 'make universe' on both 9-current and > RELENG_8, so I've committed it to those 2 branches along with the recent > update. I'll also submit it upstream. > Thanks! Marius
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110706095514.GF14797>