Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:57:51 +0100 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: Royce Williams <royce@alaska.net> Cc: s3raphi <seraphi.lord@gmail.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, cperciva@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 7.0, ZFS and freebsd-update Message-ID: <4793616F.9080102@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <479128FA.1020204@alaska.net> References: <1195488856.19739.42.camel@bauer.cse.buffalo.edu> <4741BB44.7010906@freebsd.org> <20071122202437.GA77577@heff.fud.org.nz> <14958104.post@talk.nabble.com> <479128FA.1020204@alaska.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Royce Williams wrote: > s3raphi wrote, on 1/18/2008 12:19 PM: >> I am trying to run freebsd-update on 7.0-RC1 on a system with a ZFS >> root and >> am also having problems with flags: >> >> [root@newsrv ~]# freebsd-update install >> Installing updates...chflags: ///lib/libc.so.7: Operation not supported >> >> Is there a workaround for this? > > Since all of my filesystems on my 7.0 system are ZFS, I've been making a > copy of freebsd-update with the "chflag" calls commented out. Since ZFS > doesn't support flags yet, this is harmless. > > If any of your primary filesystems are not ZFS, this is not a good > solution. > > If you go this route, you'll have to watch for changes to freebsd-update > and reapply them. > > I expect that once ZFS is no longer considered experimental, > freebsd-update will have a way to handle this. > > Royce > Probably chflags failure should not be treated as a fatal error. NFS / would have the same failure mode. Kris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4793616F.9080102>