Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 06 May 2005 15:04:41 +0400
From:      Denis Peplin <den@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Juergen Unger <j.unger@addict.de>
Cc:        Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
Subject:   Re: mergemaster improvement (auto-update for not modified files)
Message-ID:  <427B4F49.9070705@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20050503222512.GA53874@crow.addict.de>
References:  <427743ED.6020200@FreeBSD.org> <20050503120958.Y42342@eleanor.us1.wmi.uvac.net> <4277BFD7.2000508@elischer.org> <20050503222512.GA53874@crow.addict.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello!

Juergen Unger wrote:
> On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 11:15:51AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
>>files that I have not touched are at default state and I wnat them to move 
>>to teh new default state. Files I have touched, I want to look at by hand.
> 
> 
> so do I.  And to go a step further: why do we at all have to run
> this things in single-user mode ?
> Not that I am not aware of the technical reasons for it
> BUT: why don't we run both the installworld and the mergemaster
> jobs in a manner where they only _preparing_ the installation of
> the update ? ... maybe creating a jobfile which could be
> run automatically during reboot to make the update instantaneous
> happen without a long downtime to do it all manually in
> single-user mode over a slow serial console ?

Ideas like this are definitely flying around.
In addition I can say that it will be good to recieve control
back even if something goes wrong on such auto-update.
Maybe statically-linked sshd in root directory would help in such
(and many other) situations.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?427B4F49.9070705>