Date: Fri, 30 Aug 1996 04:21:25 +0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@spinner.DIALix.COM> To: Sujal Patel <smpatel@umiacs.umd.edu> Cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com>, Peter Wemm <peter@freefall.freebsd.org>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/bind - Imported sources Message-ID: <199608292021.EAA02973@spinner.DIALix.COM> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 29 Aug 1996 16:15:06 -0400." <Pine.OSF.3.91.960829161346.26532P-100000@mickey.umiacs.umd.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sujal Patel wrote: > On Thu, 29 Aug 1996, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > > GAG!!! This violates the BSD src tree paradigm of having the src tree > > layout reflect the installtion directory and your going to have to > > do a bunch of BINDIR=blah blah to make this work.... > > > > host, dig go in src/usr.bin > > named, ndc, nslookup go in src/usr.sbin > > named-xfer goes in src/libexec > > can we somehow have some symlinks from the "correct" spot to the spot in > the source tree. This has already become a problem with GNU software (I > can't always remember what's GNU and what isn't :-) > > Sujal Just a followup on what I said before.. I realise that just because the tree layout isn't completely pure elsewhere doesn't make this "ok" automatically. My defence was that I wasn't the first.. No, symlinks dont come through CVS, so it'll have to be moved if that's what is the right thing to do (which I'm happy to do). Cheers, -Peter
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199608292021.EAA02973>