Date: Sat, 5 Jul 1997 03:55:11 +0400 (MSD) From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: "Daniel O'Callaghan" <danny@panda.hilink.com.au> Cc: Adam David <adam@veda.is>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-sbin@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/init init.c Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970705035159.22922A-100000@lsd.relcom.eu.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970705094831.869V-100000@panda.hilink.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 5 Jul 1997, Daniel O'Callaghan wrote: > There is a small chance that /etc/ttys is modified, but init not HUPed > before a shutdown. Would it not be more appropriate to revoke the It does no harm, they would be killed by TERM. > processes being watched, rather than reading from /etc/ttys? What you mean by "being watched"? Init watch only getty lines and _not_ watch pty lines, it is why /etc/ttys used instead of init internal list. Retrieving full list of processes with control tty envolve bloating init with kvm stuff which is not acceptable. -- Andrey A. Chernov <ache@null.net> http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.970705035159.22922A-100000>