Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 16:28:59 +0200 (CEST) From: Helge Oldach <ctm-users@oldach.net> To: jhs@berklix.org (Julian Stacey) Cc: ctm-users@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs -R export -r RELENG_5_2 src Message-ID: <200408151428.i7FESxPa073839@sep.oldach.net> In-Reply-To: <200408151150.i7FBoWsP036421@flip.jhs.private> from Julian Stacey at "Aug 15, 2004 1:50:32 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Julian Stacey: > Anyway, it seems those CVSUP users have a luxury we CTM users don't > have: they get to have a more recent kernel, why is that ? Do they? AFAIK we CTM users basically receive a constant stream of deltas, for src-4 and src-cur (and ports-cur). 5.2.1-p9 is just a snapshot of this stream of deltas at a specific given time. However, under CTM it's not named 5.2.1-p9 but just RELENG_5. > how come those > CVSUP users get a P9, & we CTM users need to run cvs after receiving > the cvs tree by ctm, why can't we have a CTM 5 stable feed. AFAIK src-cur is just that. FWIW, I (running src-4 aka 4-STABLE) have added a single line to sys/conf/newvers.sh: --- newvers.sh.ctm Wed May 26 00:38:01 2004 +++ newvers.sh Thu May 27 23:39:50 2004 @@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ touch version v=`cat version` u=${USER-root} d=`pwd` h=`hostname` t=`date` +test -f $(dirname $0)/../../.ctm_status && read DUMMY v <$(dirname $0)/../../.ctm_status cat << EOF > vers.c $COPYRIGHT char sccspad[32 - 4 /* sizeof(sccs) */] = { '\\0' }; This overrides the "kernel generation number" and displays the number of my CTM delta instead: FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE #1953: Tue Aug 10 12:50:10 CEST 2004 toor@localhost:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC In other words, I am currently on a machine that has src-4.1953.gz applied, but no further deltas. (This may change tonight. :-)) Helge
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200408151428.i7FESxPa073839>