Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 16:28:59 +0200 (CEST) From: Helge Oldach <ctm-users@oldach.net> To: jhs@berklix.org (Julian Stacey) Cc: ctm-users@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs -R export -r RELENG_5_2 src Message-ID: <200408151428.i7FESxPa073839@sep.oldach.net> In-Reply-To: <200408151150.i7FBoWsP036421@flip.jhs.private> from Julian Stacey at "Aug 15, 2004 1:50:32 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Julian Stacey:
> Anyway, it seems those CVSUP users have a luxury we CTM users don't
> have: they get to have a more recent kernel, why is that ?
Do they?
AFAIK we CTM users basically receive a constant stream of deltas, for
src-4 and src-cur (and ports-cur). 5.2.1-p9 is just a snapshot of this
stream of deltas at a specific given time. However, under CTM it's not
named 5.2.1-p9 but just RELENG_5.
> how come those
> CVSUP users get a P9, & we CTM users need to run cvs after receiving
> the cvs tree by ctm, why can't we have a CTM 5 stable feed.
AFAIK src-cur is just that.
FWIW, I (running src-4 aka 4-STABLE) have added a single line to
sys/conf/newvers.sh:
--- newvers.sh.ctm Wed May 26 00:38:01 2004
+++ newvers.sh Thu May 27 23:39:50 2004
@@ -86,6 +86,7 @@
touch version
v=`cat version` u=${USER-root} d=`pwd` h=`hostname` t=`date`
+test -f $(dirname $0)/../../.ctm_status && read DUMMY v <$(dirname $0)/../../.ctm_status
cat << EOF > vers.c
$COPYRIGHT
char sccspad[32 - 4 /* sizeof(sccs) */] = { '\\0' };
This overrides the "kernel generation number" and displays the number of
my CTM delta instead:
FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE #1953: Tue Aug 10 12:50:10 CEST 2004 toor@localhost:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
In other words, I am currently on a machine that has src-4.1953.gz
applied, but no further deltas. (This may change tonight. :-))
Helge
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200408151428.i7FESxPa073839>