Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 20:33:18 +0000 From: Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org> To: Chuck Burns <break19@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: setting CC/CXX/CPP unconditionally in src.conf Message-ID: <20120229203318.GA88216@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4F4D6C7D.3030109@gmail.com> References: <20120226213703.GA33988@freebsd.org> <4F4D34C8.9080507@FreeBSD.org> <20120228221149.GA95661@freebsd.org> <4F4D5B63.6020306@FreeBSD.org> <4F4D6C7D.3030109@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue Feb 28 12, Chuck Burns wrote:
> On 2/28/2012 4:55 PM, Ade Lovett wrote:
> >On 2/28/2012 14:11, Alexander Best wrote:
> >>any chance we can have a CFLAGS.gcc and CFLAGS.clang in the future?
> >>that would
> >>make certain things a lot easier. dealing with gcc specific options,
> >>such as
> >>-mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 would simply work by setting
> >>CFLAGS.gcc=-mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 e.g.
> >
> >You already can:
> >
> >CFLAGS.cc= cc_cflags_here
> >CFLAGS.clang= clang_cflags_here
> >
> >CFLAGS+= generic_cflags_here
> >CFLAGS+= ${CFLAGS.${CC}}
> >
> >
> >-aDe
>
> I think was asking for adding a third...
> .cc for base gcc
> .clang for .. clang......
> and .gcc for ports gcc4x
> ..
>
> At least, thats how I read it, I could be wrong, it's happened before.
no you're right. ade's example suits users very well who want to use it in
their src.conf. however what i had in mind was something that can be put into
the makefiles by developers and which is implemented in *.mk mannor.
cheers.
alex
>
> Chuck
>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120229203318.GA88216>