Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 03:37:01 -0800 (PST) From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) To: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au Cc: nate@rocky.sri.MT.net, jkh@time.cdrom.com, current@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: pcnfsd.. Message-ID: <199512201137.DAA03249@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> In-Reply-To: <199512192252.JAA10809@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> (message from Michael Smith on Wed, 20 Dec 1995 09:21:59 %2B1030 (CST))
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* If it moves, so does samba and that DHCP daemon that I keep hearing about 8) * I'd say that they get an awful lot more use than pcnfsd. (Or would if * people knew about them 8) Hmm. Jordan, can you please explain why it can't be happy as a port/package? I can't understand why putting it in the main distribution is going to win over a binary package, which is even on the CD! Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199512201137.DAA03249>