Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 11:08:24 -0800 From: Adam Wight <adamw@brsys.com> To: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG, batz <batsy@vapour.net> Cc: Mark Foster <mdf@enic.cc>, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Managing port security upgrades (was:Re: PHP 4.1.2) Message-ID: <20020314110824.B7150@brsys.com> In-Reply-To: <200203132050.g2DKoWP52263@bmah.dyndns.org>; from Bruce A. Mah on Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 12:50:32PM -0800 References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0203131506270.5001-100000@vapour.net> <200203132050.g2DKoWP52263@bmah.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I think I should clarify that the original problem was bringing specific port Makefiles, patches, etc. up-to-date in a low-bandwidth fashion, not simply getting the distfiles. -adam On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 12:50:32PM -0800, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > If memory serves me right, batz wrote: > > On 13 Mar 2002, Mark Foster wrote: > > > > :Sounds alot like > > :pkg_version -c -v | sh > > : > > :(assuming an updated ports tree) > > > > Yeah, it does. So much for streamlining. Somebody > > close the patent office, everything has been invented. > > Please RTFM for pkg_version(8), paying particular attention to the > warnings *against* doing this very thing. > > Bruce. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020314110824.B7150>