Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:30:46 -0300 From: Marcelo <araujobsdport@gmail.com> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, gahr@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/gdcm distinfo Message-ID: <AANLkTikvAfu-MxGn2jMTjEEjE1C2C8wd1ooFGFRsbbij@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20100713151205.GB95556@FreeBSD.org> References: <201007131351.o6DDpcmT044616@repoman.freebsd.org> <20100713144320.GA95556@FreeBSD.org> <20100713144735.GK48019@gahrfit.gahr.ch> <20100713151205.GB95556@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Another easier way to make sure is, just get the oldest distfiles and the new one, run a full diff and check what the output will show you. If case appears some big changes, do to contact the upstream maintainer and ask about. Regards, - Araujo 2010/7/13 Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 04:47:35PM +0200, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > > On 2010-Jul-13, 14:43, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 01:51:38PM +0000, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > > > > gahr 2010-07-13 13:51:38 UTC > > > > > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > > > > > Modified files: > > > > devel/gdcm distinfo > > > > Log: > > > > - Update distinfo (tarball rerolled) > > > > > > Per Project's bylaws, explicit acknowledgment of the fact that no > > > malicious changes were introduced in the updated distfiles is required > > > in the commit message. > > > > Sure, "tarball rerolled" was meant to do just that :) > > :-) Still, it usually doesn't hurt to ask upstream maintainer why > distfile was rerolled and reflect this in commit message, just to be sure. > > ./danfe > -- Marcelo Araujo araujo@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTikvAfu-MxGn2jMTjEEjE1C2C8wd1ooFGFRsbbij>