Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 19 Aug 2013 17:16:43 +0800
From:      Chenchong Qin <qinchenchong@gmail.com>
To:        soc-status@freebsd.org
Subject:   Weekly Status Report, Aug 19, 2013
Message-ID:  <CAFnsE3cNP9RZrq_5%2BFdow5yNVtOfz5QjRJN6mvfwMzzkf1A--A@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi!

Here is last week's status.

* add a new struct, ieee80211_ratectl_node. This is the common state that
all per node rc
  state, i.e. ieee80211_[amrr|sample]_node, should contains it as the first
field. It's now used to
  store the capabilities. see below.
* rename ir_capabilities to irn_capabilities and move it to
ieee80211_ratectl_node (it contained in
  ieee80211_[amrr|sample]_node). ieee80211_ratectl is readonly, so
ir_capabilities can't be set.
  And, the capabilities is not a part of rc algo. It seems that it should
be put in the per node rc state.
  Interface of ieee80211_ratectl_node_init() and its callers  are updated.
References to ir_capabilities   are also adapted.
* add ieee80211_ratectl_[node_is11n|get_rateset] to the ratectl api. rc
algoes all need these
  functions.
* change the naming conversion of IEEE80211_RATECTL_FLAG_*.
* some errors fixed.

Thanks!

Chenchong



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFnsE3cNP9RZrq_5%2BFdow5yNVtOfz5QjRJN6mvfwMzzkf1A--A>