Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 03:47:22 +0000 From: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: Ernie Luzar <luzar722@gmail.com>, =?UTF-8?Q?Trond_Endrest=C3=B8l?= <Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no>, FreeBSD current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: console in 11.0-ALPHA4 Message-ID: <CAPyFy2Cu6a318q%2B74TBJ=z40UyVorqc7h13=BpGCxM0COcWJ9A@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <31205295.d0H0JTrSWj@ralph.baldwin.cx> References: <57680D69.7030309@gmail.com> <CAPyFy2Cyx%2BsAUa8cqvdEWFqLWJ36Zo_tLri57pKFH7MZvWK4Uw@mail.gmail.com> <576857F3.5040102@gmail.com> <31205295.d0H0JTrSWj@ralph.baldwin.cx>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 20 June 2016 at 23:22, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote: > > There are tradeoffs in both directions. Neither console is a subset of the > other. However, sc(4) is not really extendable to support the things it is > missing. vt(4) is actively worked on, and patches for the features it lacks > that you need are certainly welcomed. You may also switch back to sc(4) by adding "kern.vty=sc" to /boot/loader.conf.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPyFy2Cu6a318q%2B74TBJ=z40UyVorqc7h13=BpGCxM0COcWJ9A>