Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 12:44:37 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Current problem reports assigned to emulation@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20121106114437.GA512@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxgm-nkkQZSkqB5fqP3yK2wY4RhjpXfeKat8sjoifju6Z6A@mail.gmail.com> References: <201211051106.qA5B6SUu000999@freefall.freebsd.org> <5097B159.3080600@coosemans.org> <5097DB3B.1070307@passap.ru> <CAF6rxgm-nkkQZSkqB5fqP3yK2wY4RhjpXfeKat8sjoifju6Z6A@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 12:32:39PM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote: > On 5 November 2012 10:28, Boris Samorodov <bsam@passap.ru> wrote: > >> Can I politely ask for emulation@ to give up maintainership for this port? > >> Nobody here keeps this port updated and when patches are submitted nobody > >> commits them. > > This is false. I maintain the flash port (with an emulation@ hat). I > thought such PRs were supposed to be auto-assigned to me. I will look > into why they are not. > > > > Any committer may commit this PR with log: > > "Approved by: emulation@ (maintainer timeout XX weeks)" > > teams don't time out. Since when (any rules to say that?)? imho that would be incredibly stupid that a team do not timeout, what happen in the case noone from a team have a look to a PR because of ENOTIME, or lack of resources or interest? regards, Bapt [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlCY+CUACgkQ8kTtMUmk6ExC0wCfTcF9Dtd+BhPai7MVOp3FOdOj Fp8AnRnxkDxSx2rJNI98kZaLfon0vF/5 =4y5r -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121106114437.GA512>